Skip to main content
GutCited

Is the microbiome the answer to inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review.

Devansh Shah, Fiona Phan, Zirong Yu, Joseph Do Woong Choi, James Wei Tatt Toh
Systematic Review Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2025 3 次引用
PubMed DOI PDF
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D41186727'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

研究类型
Systematic Review
研究人群
IBD patients vs healthy controls (83 observational studies)
干预措施
Is the microbiome the answer to inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. None
对照组
Healthy controls
主要结局
Gut microbiome composition differences in IBD
效应方向
Negative
偏倚风险
Moderate

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses two main conditions - Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Its pathogenesis is vastly unknown but genetics, environmental factors and the gut microbiome are thought to play vital roles. While dysbiosis is thought to be a feature of IBD, its exact role in pathogenesis is unclear. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through searching Medline and Embase from database inception to January 2025. Only gastrointestinal microbiome studies comparing IBD human patients with healthy controls (HC), performed on faecal, mucosal biopsy, saliva, or oral swab samples were examined. Studies were excluded if they included ≤ 10 IBD patients, did not compare IBD to HC, reported on IBD with other gastrointestinal infections, all were taking IBD medications, or included post-operative bowel resection patients. RESULTS: Of 83 identified observational studies, most reported reduced alpha and beta diversity in IBD, more prevalent in CD than UC. There was depletion of protective butyrate producing Firmicutes bacteria including Faecalibacterium (specifically F. prausnitzii), Eubacteria, Roseburia, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae (mainly R. bromii). There was decreased Bacteroidetes phylum in IBD, with depletion of Bacteroides genus in CD but increased in UC. There was increased Proteobacteria and its family Enterobacteriaceae in IBD. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiome in IBD demonstrated reduced biodiversity, more pronounced in CD, with increased pathogenic and reduced beneficial bacteria. While this study demonstrated important associations between the microbiome and IBD, the exact mechanism, whether it be from a multistep process, a causative agent, or interplay between mucosal immunology and dysbiosis, is yet be elucidated.

简要概述

The gut microbiome in IBD demonstrated reduced biodiversity, more pronounced in CD, with increased pathogenic and reduced beneficial bacteria, and important associations between the microbiome and IBD.

Full Text

PDF
Loading PDF...

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers