描述
Forest plot summarizing the pooled efficacy of probiotic interventions across multiple gastrointestinal conditions, with odds ratios and confidence intervals for each included trial.
More Figures from This Paper
Figure 2
Subgroup analysis by probiotic strain type reveals differential efficacy, with Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces species showing the strongest associations with symptom improvement.
forest_plot
Figure 3
Funnel plot assessment for publication bias in the probiotic meta-analysis indicates generally symmetric distribution of effect sizes around the pooled estimate.
chart
Figure 4
Stratified forest plot examining probiotic efficacy specifically in antibiotic-associated diarrhea trials shows a significant protective effect compared to placebo.
forest_plot
Figure 5
Sensitivity analysis removing individual studies demonstrates that the overall positive association between probiotic supplementation and gastrointestinal symptom relief remains robust.
forest_plotFigure 1
Forest PlotSource Paper
A meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases.Cite This Figure
 > Source: Marina L Ritchie et al. "A meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases.." *PloS one*, 2012. PMID: [22529959](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22529959/)
<figure> <img src="https://pdfs.citedhealth.com/figures/22529959/131.png" alt="Forest plot summarizing the pooled efficacy of probiotic interventions across multiple gastrointestinal conditions, with odds ratios and confidence intervals for each included trial." /> <figcaption>Figure 1. Forest plot summarizing the pooled efficacy of probiotic interventions across multiple gastrointestinal conditions, with odds ratios and confidence intervals for each included trial.<br> Source: Marina L Ritchie et al. "A meta-analysis of probiotic efficacy for gastrointestinal diseases.." <em>PloS one</em>, 2012. PMID: <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22529959/">22529959</a></figcaption> </figure>