Skip to main content
GutCited

Aloe vera Is Effective and Safe in Short-term Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Seung Wook Hong, Jaeyoung Chun, Sunmin Park, Hyun Jung Lee, Jong Pil Im et al.
Review Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility 2018 33 atıf
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D30153721'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Çalışma Türü
Meta-Analysis
Örneklem Büyüklüğü
151
Popülasyon
Patients with IBS
Müdahale
Aloe vera Is Effective and Safe in Short-term Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. None
Karşılaştırıcı
Placebo
Birincil Sonuç
IBS symptom severity score
Etki Yönü
Positive
Yanlılık Riski
Moderate

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aloe vera (AV) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies dated between 1st January 1960 and 30th December 2017. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared AV to placebo in patients with IBS. The primary outcome was standardized mean difference of the change in severity of IBS symptoms as measured by patient-rated scales. Secondary outcomes included response rate of IBS symptoms and adverse events. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochrane's Q and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Three RCTs with a total of 151 patients with IBS were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference for patients with AV compared to those with placebo regarding improvement in IBS symptom score (standardized mean difference, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.07-0.75; P = 0.020). Using intention-to-treat analysis, the AV patients showed significantly better response rates of IBS symptoms compared to placebo (pooled risk ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.05-2.73; P = 0.030). No adverse events related with AV were found in included studies. There was no significant heterogeneity of effects across studies (P = 0.900; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: AV is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with IBS compared to placebo.

Kısaca

AV is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with IBS compared to placebo and there was no significant heterogeneity of effects across studies.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers