Skip to main content
GutCited

Randomised clinical trial: Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818 probiotic vs placebo, and impact on gut transit time, symptoms, and gut microbiology in chronic constipation.

Eirini Dimidi, Ausra Zdanaviciene, Stephanos Christodoulides, Shiva Taheri, Petra Louis et al.
RCT Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2019 59 次引用
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D30585341'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

研究类型
Randomized Controlled Trial
样本量
75
研究人群
None
持续时间
4.0 weeks
干预措施
Randomised clinical trial: Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818 probiotic vs placebo, and impact on gut transit time, symptoms, and gut microbiology in chronic constipation. 1010 CFU/d
对照组
Placebo
主要结局
Gut microbiota composition
效应方向
Mixed
偏倚风险
Unclear

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder. Patient dissatisfaction with prescribed medications is common, and there is need for alternative management strategies. Evidence shows that Bifidobacterium species may be beneficial in constipation. AIM: To investigate changes in physiological and clinical measures of gut function in patients with chronic constipation following the consumption of Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818, compared to placebo. METHODS: Participants were randomised to a 4-week supplementation with B. lactis NCC2818 (1.5 x 1010 CFU/d) or placebo. Gut transit time was measured using a radio-opaque marker, while symptoms and quality of life were assessed using validated questionnaires. Gut microbiota composition was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Analysis of covariance was used for normally distributed variables, and Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed variables. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised. There was no significant difference between the probiotic and placebo groups in gut transit time change from baseline to week 2 (-11.7 hours, SD 33.0 hours vs -12.9 hours, SD 33.6 hours; P = 0.863) or to week 4 (-20.4 hours, SD 32.5 h vs -8.7 hours, SD 33.8 hours; P = 0.103). There were also no improvements in stool output, symptoms, or quality of life. No differences were found in Bifidobacterium concentrations between the probiotic and placebo groups at week 4 (9.5 log10 /g dry faeces, SD 0.3 vs 9.4 log10 /g, SD 1.0; P = 0.509). CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium lactis NCC2818 was not effective in the management of mild chronic constipation. This study highlights the importance of further studies and their publication to better understand the strain-specific effects of probiotics.

简要概述

Evidence shows that Bifidobacterium species may be beneficial in constipation, which is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder and there is need for alternative management strategies.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers