Efficacy and Safety of Over-the-Counter Therapies for Chronic Constipation: An Updated Systematic Review.
Study Design
- Тип исследования
- Systematic Review
- Популяция
- Adults with chronic constipation
- Вмешательство
- Efficacy and Safety of Over-the-Counter Therapies for Chronic Constipation: An Updated Systematic Review. None
- Препарат сравнения
- Placebo
- Первичный исход
- Constipation symptom relief
- Направление эффекта
- Positive
- Риск систематической ошибки
- Moderate
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Constipation is commonly treated with over-the-counter (OTC) products whose efficacy and safety remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of OTC therapies for chronic constipation and provide evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials of ≥4-week duration that evaluated OTC preparations between 2004 and 2020. Studies were scored using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria (0-5 scale) including randomization, blinding, and withdrawals. The strengths of evidence were adjudicated within each therapeutic category, and recommendations were graded (A, B, C, D, and I) based on the level of evidence (level I, good; II, fair; or III, poor). RESULTS: Of 1,297 studies identified, 41 met the inclusion criteria. There was good evidence (grade A recommendation) for the use of the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG) and the stimulant senna; moderate evidence (grade B) for psyllium, SupraFiber, magnesium salts, stimulants (bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate), fruit-based laxatives (kiwi, mango, prunes, and ficus), and yogurt with galacto-oligosaccharide/prunes/linseed oil; and insufficient evidence (grade I) for polydextrose, inulin, and fructo-oligosaccharide. Diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain were common adverse events, but no serious adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: The spectrum of OTC products has increased and quality of evidence has improved, but methodological issues including variability in study design, primary outcome measures, trial duration, and small sample sizes remain. We found good evidence to recommend polyethylene glycol or senna as first-line laxatives and moderate evidence supporting fiber supplements, fruits, stimulant laxatives, and magnesium-based products. For others, further validation with more rigorously designed studies is warranted.
Кратко
Good evidence to recommend polyethylene glycol or senna as first-line laxatives and moderate evidence supporting fiber supplements, fruits, stimulant laxatives, and magnesium-based products are found.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2000
Prebiotics and probiotics: are they functional foods?
Journal of biosciences · 2002
Applications of inulin and oligofructose in health and nutrition.
The American journal of clinical nutrition · 1997
Effects of inulin and lactose on fecal microflora, microbial activity, and bowel habit in elderly constipated persons.
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008
Effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Digestion · 2016
Reduced Abundance of Butyrate-Producing Bacteria Species in the Fecal Microbial Community in Crohn's Disease.
Gut · 2017