Skip to main content
GutCited

Is there a role for fish oil in inflammatory bowel disease?

Affifa Farrukh, John Francis Mayberry
Review World journal of clinical cases 2014 25 인용
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D25032198'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

연구 유형
Review
대상 집단
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
중재
Is there a role for fish oil in inflammatory bowel disease? None
대조군
None
일차 결과
Inflammatory bowel disease management
효과 방향
Mixed
비뚤림 위험
Unclear

Abstract

A number of animal and human studies suggest omega 3-fatty acids are anti-inflammatory. As a result they may have a therapeutic role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this review is to briefly assess the literature about the utility of poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the management of IBD. Taken together, almost all studies suggest some beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs in IBD but the mechanism remains controversial. In addition, clinical benefit seems to be largely confined to ulcerative colitis. However all studies have concluded that these compounds have no potential for a steroid/aminosalicylic acid sparing effect or to maintain remission. Now the question arises as to whether this treatment is of real value to IBD patients? Clearly they have some therapeutic potential but further work is needed.

요약

Almost all studies suggest some beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs in IBD but the mechanism remains controversial and clinical benefit seems to be largely confined to ulcerative colitis.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers