Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for the Management of Functional Abdominal Pain in Childhood: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Study Design
- अध्ययन प्रकार
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- नमूना आकार
- 101
- जनसंख्या
- Children aged 6-15 with functional abdominal pain
- अवधि
- 16 weeks
- हस्तक्षेप
- Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for the Management of Functional Abdominal Pain in Childhood: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. L. reuteri DSM 17938 (1e8 CFU twice daily)
- तुलनित्र
- placebo
- प्राथमिक परिणाम
- abdominal pain severity (Wong-Baker FACES)
- प्रभाव की दिशा
- Positive
- पूर्वाग्रह का जोखिम
- Low
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 is beneficial in functional abdominal pain (FAP) of childhood. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 101 children, aged 6-15 years, who fulfilled the Rome III criteria for FAP were enrolled in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and were randomly assigned to receive either L reuteri DSM 17938 or placebo for 4 weeks, with further follow-up of additional 4 weeks. Response to therapy was based on a self-reported daily questionnaire monitoring frequency and intensity of abdominal pain, using the faces scoring system by Hicks. RESULTS: L reuteri (n = 47) was significantly superior to placebo (n = 46) in relieving frequency (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 3.6 ± 1.7 episodes/wk, P < .02) and intensity (4.3 ± 2.2 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 Hicks score/wk, P < .01) of abdominal pain following 4 weeks of supplementation. There was no difference in school absenteeism rate or other gastrointestinal symptoms, except for a lower incidence of perceived abdominal distention and bloating, favoring L reuteri. CONCLUSIONS: L reuteri DSM 17938, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the frequency and intensity of FAP in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClicalTrials.gov: NCT01180556.
संक्षेप में
L reuteri DSM 17938, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the frequency and intensity of FAP in children, and there was no difference in school absenteeism rate or other gastrointestinal symptoms, except for a lower incidence of perceived abdominal distention and bloating, favoring L reuteru.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
Efficacy and safety of probiotic-supplemented triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Beneficial microbes · 2018
Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial on Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938: improvement in symptoms and bowel habit in functional constipation.
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
Efficacy and safety of APT036 versus simethicone in the treatment of functional bloating: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, clinical study.
Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2013
Probiotic vs. Placebo in Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
The evidence for probiotics in the treatment of digestive disorders in the pediatric population.
Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2025