Efficacy and complications of polyethylene glycols for treatment of constipation in children: a meta-analysis.
Study Design
- Тип исследования
- Meta-Analysis
- Популяция
- Children with functional constipation
- Вмешательство
- Efficacy and complications of polyethylene glycols for treatment of constipation in children: a meta-analysis. None
- Препарат сравнения
- Lactulose, milk of magnesia, enema, placebo
- Первичный исход
- Treatment of constipation in children
- Направление эффекта
- Positive
- Риск систематической ошибки
- Moderate
Abstract
Constipation is a common childhood complaint. In 90% to 95% of children, constipation is functional, which means that there is no objective evidence of an underlying pathological condition. Polyethylene glycol (PEG or macrogol) solution is an osmotic laxative agent that is absorbed in only trace amounts from the gastrointestinal tract and routinely used to treat chronic constipation in adults. Here, we report the results of a meta-analysis of PEG-based laxatives compared with lactulose, milk of magnesia (magnesium hydroxide), oral liquid paraffin (mineral oil), or acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose in children. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and involved searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases up to February 10, 2014, using the keywords (Constipation OR Functional Constipation OR Fecal Impaction) AND (Children) AND (Polyethylene Glycol OR Laxative). Primary efficacy outcomes included a number of stool passages/wk and percentage of patients who reported satisfactory stool consistency. Secondary safety outcomes included diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, pain or straining at defecation, bloating or flatulence, hard stool consistency, poor palatability, and rectal bleeding. We identified 231 articles, 27 of which were suitable for full-text review and 10 of which were used in the meta-analysis. Patients who were treated with PEG experienced more successful disimpaction compared with those treated with non-PEG laxatives. Treatment-related adverse events were acceptable and generally well tolerated. PEG-based laxatives are effective and safe for chronic constipation and for resolving fecal impaction in children. Children's acceptance of PEG-based laxatives appears to be better than non-PEG laxatives. Optimal dosages, routes of administration, and PEG regimens should be determined in future randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses.
Кратко
PEG-based laxatives are effective and safe for chronic constipation and for resolving fecal impaction in children and children’s acceptance of PEG- based laxatives appears to be better than non-PEG laxatives.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008
Effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2017
Understanding the Physics of Functional Fibers in the Gastrointestinal Tract: An Evidence-Based Approach to Resolving Enduring Misconceptions about Insoluble and Soluble Fiber.
The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
Fiber and functional gastrointestinal disorders.
International journal of pharmaceutics · 2007
Psyllium as therapeutic and drug delivery agent.
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2004
Systematic review: the role of different types of fibre in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009