Skip to main content
GutCited

Zinc supplementation in acute diarrhea is acceptable, does not interfere with oral rehydration, and reduces the use of other medications: a randomized trial in five countries.

Shally Awasthi, INCLEN Childnet Zinc Effectiveness for Diarrhea (IC-ZED) Group
RCT Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2006 55 trích dẫn
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D16540790'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Loại nghiên cứu
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cỡ mẫu
2002
Đối tượng nghiên cứu
Children 2-59 months with acute watery diarrhea in 5 countries
Thời gian
2 weeks
Can thiệp
Zinc supplementation in acute diarrhea is acceptable, does not interfere with oral rehydration, and reduces the use of other medications: a randomized trial in five countries. 20 mg zinc daily for 14 days
Đối chứng
ORS alone (control)
Kết quả chính
Zinc supplementation in acute diarrhea is acceptable, does not interfere with or
Xu hướng hiệu quả
Neutral
Nguy cơ sai lệch
Moderate

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of zinc supplementation with locally developed culturally specific educational statements (messages) on oral rehydration solution (ORS) and antibiotics or antidiarrheal use in children with acute watery diarrhea as well as to assess adherence and side effects of zinc. METHODS: This was a randomized effectiveness trial conducted in outpatient health facilities of six sites in five countries, namely, Fortaleza (Brazil), Addis Adaba (Ethiopia), Cairo (Egypt), Lucknow and Nagpur (India), and Manila (Philippines). Participants were 2,002 children aged 2 to 59 months. Intervention was zinc (20 mg orally, once daily for 14 days) with ORS (zinc group) compared with ORS alone (control group). Primary outcomes were ORS use on day 3 to 5; adherence to zinc; and any use of an antibacterial/antidiarrheal up to day 14. RESULTS: One thousand ten and 992 children enrolled in zinc and control groups, respectively. Loss to follow-up on days 3 to 5 and 15 to 17 was 1.2% and 2.8% in the zinc group and 0.8% and 1.7% in the control group. In five of six sites, ORS use in cases with continued diarrhea on days 3 to 5 was the same in the two groups or higher in zinc group. Overall adherence to zinc supplementation was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81-86). There was no difference in vomiting by group. In consideration of the six countries overall, less antibiotic/antidiarrheal use occurred in the zinc group (absolute difference, 3.8% [95% CI 1.7-5.9]). CONCLUSIONS: In the management of acute watery diarrhea, zinc plus ORS along with culturally appropriate, site-specific messages in local language does not affect overall ORS use generally and decreases antibiotic/antidiarrheal use; children had good adherence without side effects.

Tóm lược

In the management of acute watery diarrhea, zinc plus ORS along with culturally appropriate, site-specific messages in local language does not affect overall ORS use generally and decreases antibiotic/antidiarrheal use; children had good adherence without side effects.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers