Skip to main content
GutCited

Efficacy of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Fuqiang Yuan, Huijuan Ni, Carl V Asche, Minchul Kim, Saqib Walayat et al.
Meta-Analysis Current medical research and opinion 2017 86 цитирований
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D28166427'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Тип исследования
Meta-Analysis
Популяция
Patients with IBS
Вмешательство
Efficacy of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. None
Препарат сравнения
Placebo
Первичный исход
IBS symptom severity (pain, bloating)
Направление эффекта
Mixed
Риск систематической ошибки
Unclear

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a challenge because its cause remains unknown. Previous clinical trials to examine the efficacy of probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 (B. infantis) in patients with IBS have shown inconsistent findings. This study aimed to assess the combined effect of B. infantis on reducing the symptom severity of IBS based on the published data. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models to estimate the combined effect of B. infantis on primary outcomes, which included abdominal pain, bloating/distention, and bowel habit satisfaction. A systematic review was performed based on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify the randomized controlled trials comparing probiotic B. infantis with placebo in treating IBS symptoms, published up until 31 December 2016. The standardized mean difference (SMD) method was used to combine data since scales to measure the efficacy of probiotics were different among studies. RESULTS: A total of five studies were identified as suitable for inclusion, including three studies with single probiotic B. infantis and two studies with composite probiotics containing B. infantis. Treatment with single probiotic B. infantis didn't impact on abdominal pain, bloating/distention, or bowel habit satisfaction among IBS patients. However, patients who received composite probiotics containing B. infantis had significantly reduced abdominal pain (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03-0.41) and bloating/distention (SMD, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.04-0.56). After combining the data from six studies, the improvement of bloating/distention among IBS patients remained significant (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.35). CONCLUSION: Composite probiotics containing B. infantis might be an effective therapeutic option for IBS patients, which could significantly alleviate the symptoms of IBS without significant adverse effects. However, the efficacy of single probiotic B. infantis on IBS has not been confirmed yet, which needs to be further validated by more large-sized randomized clinical trials.

Кратко

Composite probiotics containing B. infantis might be an effective therapeutic option for IBS patients, which could significantly alleviate the symptoms of IBS without significant adverse effects, but needs to be further validated by more large-sized randomized clinical trials.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers