Skip to main content
GutCited

Soluble or insoluble fibre in irritable bowel syndrome in primary care? Randomised placebo controlled trial.

C J Bijkerk, N J de Wit, J W M Muris, P J Whorwell, J A Knottnerus et al.
RCT BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2009 296 citations
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D19713235'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Study Type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sample Size
97
Population
IBS patients
Duration
12.0 weeks
Intervention
Soluble or insoluble fibre in irritable bowel syndrome in primary care? Randomised placebo controlled trial. 10 g
Comparator
placebo
Primary Outcome
adequate symptom relief during at least two weeks in the previous month, analyse
Effect Direction
Mixed
Risk of Bias
Moderate

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of increasing the dietary content of soluble fibre (psyllium) or insoluble fibre (bran) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practice. PARTICIPANTS: 275 patients aged 18-65 years with irritable bowel syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: 12 weeks of treatment with 10 g psyllium (n=85), 10 g bran (n=97), or 10 g placebo (rice flour) (n=93). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was adequate symptom relief during at least two weeks in the previous month, analysed after one, two, and three months of treatment to assess both short term and sustained effectiveness. Secondary end points included irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity score, severity of abdominal pain, and irritable bowel syndrome quality of life scale. RESULTS: The proportion of responders was significantly greater in the psyllium group than in the placebo group during the first month (57% v 35%; relative risk 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.26) and the second month of treatment (59% v 41%; 1.44, 1.02 to 2.06). Bran was more effective than placebo during the third month of treatment only (57% v 32%; 1.70, 1.12 to 2.57), but this was not statistically significant in the worst case analysis (1.45, 0.97 to 2.16). After three months of treatment, symptom severity in the psyllium group was reduced by 90 points, compared with 49 points in the placebo group (P=0.03) and 58 points in the bran group (P=0.61 versus placebo). No differences were found with respect to quality of life. Fifty four (64%) of the patients allocated to psyllium, 54 (56%) in the bran group, and 56 (60%) in the placebo group completed the three month treatment period. Early dropout was most common in the bran group; the main reason was that the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome worsened. CONCLUSIONS: Psyllium offers benefits in patients with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00189033.

TL;DR

Psyllium offers benefits in patients with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care and was more effective than placebo during the third month of treatment only; no differences were found with respect to quality of life.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers