Skip to main content
GutCited

A re-appraisal of lactose intolerance.

L K Harrington, J F Mayberry
Review International journal of clinical practice 2008 60 件の引用
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D18822024'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

研究タイプ
Review
対象集団
A literature review was carried out to meet the aims of this paper
介入
A re-appraisal of lactose intolerance. None
比較対照
None
主要アウトカム
A re-appraisal of lactose intolerance.
効果の方向
Mixed
バイアスリスク
Unclear

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lactose, beta-galactose-1,4-glucose, is hydrolysed by the enzyme lactase. Lactose intolerance occurs when lactase deficiency causes clinical symptoms. AIMS: To provide an overview of lactose intolerance, including definition, aetiology and epidemiology, the clinical symptoms and diagnostic testing and management. METHODS: A literature review was carried out to meet the aims of this paper. This resulted in the analysis of a database of patients tested for lactose intolerance to provide examples of the consequences of problems of terminology identified. CONCLUSIONS: The terminology relating to lactose intolerance is confusing for clinicians and researchers. Clinicians need to ensure that these problematic terms do not cause diagnostic mistakes and inappropriate treatment. Researchers should be aware of inconsistent terminology in studies and resultant problems with the interpretation of results.

要約

The objective of this study was to establish whether or not the presence of lactose intolerance in the absence of lactase deficiency in mice is a cause for concern or simply a coincidence.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers