Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral aloe vera gel for active ulcerative colitis.
Study Design
- Type d'étude
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Taille de l'échantillon
- 44
- Population
- Mild-moderate active ulcerative colitis outpatients
- Durée
- 4 weeks
- Intervention
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral aloe vera gel for active ulcerative colitis. Aloe vera gel 100 mL twice daily
- Comparateur
- Placebo (2:1 ratio)
- Critère de jugement principal
- Clinical remission (SCCAI <=2)
- Direction de l'effet
- Positive
- Risque de biais
- Low
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The herbal preparation, aloe vera, has been claimed to have anti-inflammatory effects and, despite a lack of evidence of its therapeutic efficacy, is widely used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease. AIM: To perform a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of aloe vera gel for the treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Forty-four evaluable hospital out-patients were randomly given oral aloe vera gel or placebo, 100 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, in a 2 : 1 ratio. The primary outcome measures were clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index </= 2), sigmoidoscopic remission (Baron score </= 1) and histological remission (Saverymuttu score </= 1). Secondary outcome measures included changes in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (improvement was defined as a decrease of >/= 3 points; response was defined as remission or improvement), Baron score, histology score, haemoglobin, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and albumin. RESULTS: Clinical remission, improvement and response occurred in nine (30%), 11 (37%) and 14 (47%), respectively, of 30 patients given aloe vera, compared with one (7%) [P = 0.09; odds ratio, 5.6 (0.6-49)], one (7%) [P = 0.06; odds ratio, 7.5 (0.9-66)] and two (14%) [P < 0.05; odds ratio, 5.3 (1.0-27)], respectively, of 14 patients taking placebo. The Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and histological scores decreased significantly during treatment with aloe vera (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively), but not with placebo. Sigmoidoscopic scores and laboratory variables showed no significant differences between aloe vera and placebo. Adverse events were minor and similar in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Oral aloe vera taken for 4 weeks produced a clinical response more often than placebo; it also reduced the histological disease activity and appeared to be safe. Further evaluation of the therapeutic potential of aloe vera gel in inflammatory bowel disease is needed.
En bref
The herbal preparation, aloe vera, has been claimed to have anti‐inflammatory effects and, despite a lack of evidence of its therapeutic efficacy, is widely used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2006
Review article: complementary and alternative therapies for inflammatory bowel disease.
Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2012
Herbal medicine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.
Annals of gastroenterology · 2015
Herbal and plant therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2013
Systematic review: the efficacy of herbal therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.
The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement · 1998
Medical therapy of inflammatory bowel disease for the 21st century.
Nutrients · 2018