Skip to main content
GutCited

Clinical trial on the efficacy of a new symbiotic formulation, Flortec, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a multicenter, randomized study.

Angelo Andriulli, Matteo Neri, Carmelina Loguercio, Natalia Terreni, Antonio Merla et al.
RCT Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2008 73 citas
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'gutcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D18685503'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo de estudio
Randomized Controlled Trial
Tamaño de muestra
267
Población
IBS patients (overall and diarrhea-predominant)
Intervención
Clinical trial on the efficacy of a new symbiotic formulation, Flortec, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a multicenter, randomized study. None
Comparador
Prebiotic alone
Resultado primario
Efficacy of symbiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains u
Dirección del efecto
Positive
Riesgo de sesgo
Moderate

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy of symbiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains unknown. METHODS: Patients were randomized to a prebiotic (n=135), or a symbiotic formulation containing Lactobacillus paracasei B21060 (Flortec, n=132). Primary efficacy was the responder rate for pain and global relief of symptoms in the overall population and in patients with predominant diarrhea (n=47). Post hoc time-trend analyses for changes within each treatment were carried out. RESULTS: Patients with absent/mild pain amounted to 54.7% in the symbiotic group and to 57.4% in the prebiotic group at treatment week 4, and to 53.9% and 53.4% at the end of treatment. Patients with amelioration of well-being were, respectively, 60.7% versus 61.7% at treatment week 4, and 63.3% versus 60.9% at the end of treatment. Within each treatment group, patients with absent/mild pain increased in the Flortec and the prebiotic group, but time trend analyses were significant only for Flortec (P=0.019). In IBS-predominant diarrhea, Flortec significantly reduced bowel movements, pain, and IBS scores. CONCLUSIONS: To improve pain and well-being, Flortec is encouraging in patients with diarrhea predominant IBS. To establish its efficacy for the majority of IBS patients, Flortec has to be compared with an inert placebo in future work.

TL;DR

In IBS-predominant diarrhea, Flortec significantly reduced bowel movements, pain, and IBS scores, and to improve pain and well-being,Flortec is encouraging in patients with diarrhea predominant IBS.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers